Skip Navigation

  1. About Us
    1. Overview
    2. History
    3. Recognition
    4. Offices
  2. Our Practice
    1. Practice Areas
      1. Patents, Utility Models, and Industrial Designs
      2. Trademarks
      3. Copyrights
      4. Corporate, Commercial and Business Law
      5. IP Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution
      6. Regulatory Law
      7. Licensing, Tech Transfer & Franchising
      8. Anti-Piracy, Anti-Counterfeiting & Enforcement
    2. Industry Groups
      1. Media, Sports & Entertainment Law Group
      2. Life Science & Pharmaceutical Law Group
  3. Our People
    1. Partners
      1. Sergio L. Olivares, Sr. † (1931-2010)
      2. Sergio L. Olivares, Jr.
      3. Luis C. Schmidt
      4. Cesar Ramos, Jr.
      5. Antonio Belaunzarán
      6. Gustavo A. Alcocer
      7. Alejandro Luna
      8. Alonso Camargo
      9. Daniel Sanchez
    2. Associates (A - M)
      1. Osvaldo Amaral
      2. Armando Arenas
      3. Sofía Arroyo
      4. Guillermo Ballesteros
      5. Abraham Diaz
      6. Georgina Flores
      7. Pedro Herrera
    3. Associates (N - Z)
      1. Mauricio Narváez
      2. Víctor Ramírez
      3. Sergio Rangel
      4. Maria del Carmen Sada
      5. Juan Luis Serrano
      6. Guillermo Treviño
    4. Attorneys / Engineers
      1. Emilio Albarrán
      2. Agustín Azcatl
      3. Alejandra Badillo
      4. Ignacio Burgoa
      5. Fernando Calderón
      6. Martha Celis
      7. Erwin Cruz
      8. Fernanda Díaz
      9. Luz Elena Elías
      10. Maria Fenton
      11. 12 more items...
    5. Firm Administration
    6. Directory
  4. Knowledge & Resources
    1. Articles
      1. Trademark Law Articles
        1. Altering the distinctive sign of a mark
        2. Filing reforms will save paper and money
        3. Getting the Deal Through -Trademarks 2013
        4. A new solution for trade mark filing errors
        5. Crossed wires: protecting medicines in Mexico
        6. New Trademark Examiner's Manual
        7. Supreme Court: individuals can register marks
        8. Use requirements
        9. Approach to composite marks changed, again
        10. Life Sciences Handbook 2011 - Country Q&A
        11. 49 more items...
      2. Patent Law Articles
        1. PPH programmes in Mexico
        2. Patents rejected for lack of proof
        3. When copyrights and patents collide
        4. Design protection can be broadened
        5. Maximising IP rights in the life sciences industry
        6. Life Sciences - Multi-jurisdictional Guide 2012: Mexico
        7. Getting the Deal Through - Patents 2012
        8. Surge of Patent Application Final Rejections Provides Unique Opportunity for Patent Precent Making
        9. Mexico issues regulations to approve biologic drugs
        10. Latin America Roundtable
        11. 43 more items...
      3. Copyright Law Articles
        1. When copyrights and patents collide
        2. The first balanced approach to protecting copyright online
        3. How to prevent frivolous actions
        4. Advertising in social media networks
        5. Technology challenges digital rights
        6. Exceptions to copyright protection and the permitted uses of copyright works in the hi-tech and digital sectors
        7. Derechos sobre producción audiovisual
        8. How Latin America tackles cutting-edge IP issues
        9. Copyright Litigation 2010
        10. Legislation and enforcement - Copyrights 2010
        11. 103 more items...
      4. Corporate Law Articles
        1. The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Merger Control 2012
        2. Mexico issues Personal Data Protection Rules
        3. How data affects innovation
        4. A practical cross-border
        5. New registry for security interests
        6. The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Merger Control 2011
        7. The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Merger Control 2010
        8. Due diligence issues to consider in M&A
        9. Income expectations in licensing
        10. The reasons for valuation
        11. 1 more item...
      5. IP Litigation, ADR Articles
        1. Scope of new specialised courts widened
        2. Reform of preliminary injunctions
        3. Mexican Patent Office excludes Formulation Patents from Linkage Gazette
        4. Mexico gets ready to approve biocomparable drugs
        5. Mexico's hotel for the stars highlights power in the name
        6. Supreme Court upholds the worth of formulation patents
        7. Getting the Deal Through - Patents 2010
        8. Getting the Deal Through Trademarks 2010
        9. Trademark enforcement
        10. Venues for appealing IMPI decisions
        11. 15 more items...
      6. Regulatory Law Articles
        1. Life Sciences - Multi-jurisdictional Guide 2012: Mexico
        2. Maximising IP rights in the life sciences industry
        3. Recent amendment to the Federal Law for Consumer Protection
        4. Amendments to the Federal Law for Consumer Protection
        5. Mexico issues Personal Data Protection Rules
        6. New Regulations Pending
        7. Marketing authorization for pharmaceutical products to foreign applicants
        8. Data Package Exclusivity (DPE)
        9. Supreme Court upholds the worth of formulation patents
        10. Pharmaceutical trademarks
        11. 6 more items...
      7. Licensing, Tech Transfer Articles
        1. Creating a secure franchise system
      8. Anti-Piracy, Anti-Counterfeiting Articles
        1. New register against counterfeits
        2. Beat the counterfeiters in Mexico
        3. Battling counterfeits through Customs
        4. Getting the Deal Through Trademarks 2010
        5. Enforcing plant variety rights in Mexico
        6. Pharmaceutical Trademarks 2009
        7. Internet Issues
        8. Anti-counterfeiting 2009
        9. Vegetal variety rights enforced
        10. New Customs rules lead to seizures
        11. 3 more items...
      9. Media, Sports & Entertainment Focused Articles
        1. Advertising in social media networks
        2. Whither Rental Rights?
        3. Improved protection for personalities
      10. Life Sciences Focused Articles
        1. Crossed wires: protecting medicines in Mexico
        2. Current Conditions of Use Claims in the Pharmaceutical Sector in Mexico
        3. Maximising IP rights in the life sciences industry
        4. Life Sciences - Multi-jurisdictional Guide 2012: Mexico
        5. Latin America Roundtable
        6. New regulations pending
        7. The International Comparative
        8. Approval of follow-on biologics in Mexico
        9. Global Pharmaceutical Linkage Regulations:
        10. Life Sciences Handbook 2011 - Country Q&A
        11. 5 more items...
      11. 2 more items...
    2. Webinar Archive
      1. Webinar - Changes to Mexican Patent and Healthcare Laws for Life Sciences
      2. Webinar - Digital Rights Issues in Copyright Law
      3. Webinar - Data Package Exclusivity Rights in Latin America
    3. Recognition
    4. News
      1. Mexico's adhesion to the Madrid Protocol
      2. Intellectual Property: Past & Future
      3. Bill to diminish the life term of patents for medicaments
      4. Alejandro Luna's interview "La innovación
      5. Formulation patents included in the Linkage Gazette for the first time
      6. Mexico has signed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)
      7. Mexican patent office shows intention to follow the Jurisprudence by which the Mexican Supreme Court gives clarification on how the Linkage Regulation applies to formulation patents
      8. Mexico moves forward for the recognition of Data Packaging Exclusivity in Mexico
      9. Olivares & Cía. named Mexico's Firm of the Year 2012 - Copyright
      10. Mexico subscribes Madrid Protocol
      11. 12 more items...
    5. Gazettes
      1. Mexican Linkage Gazette March 2013
      2. Mexican Linkage Gazette December 2012
      3. Mexican Linkage Gazette November 2012
      4. Mexican Linkage Gazette December 2011
      5. Mexican Linkage Gazette April 2011
      6. Mexican Linkage Gazette Aug 2010
      7. Mexican Linkage Gazette Dec 2009
  5. Events
  6. Offices
  7. Contact Us
  8. Quick guide to Mexico’s regulatory system
    1. Patent regulatory overview
    2. Trademark regulatory overview
    3. Copyright regulatory overview
    4. Corporate & Commercial Regulatory overview

Home » English » Knowledge & Resources » Articles » Anti-Piracy, Anti-Counterfeiting Articles » Vegetal variety rights enforced

Vegetal variety rights enforced

By Abraham Diaz Arceo
Managing Intellectual Property, June 2008
Since Mexico is part of the UPOV international treaty, the requirement to obtain protection for vegetal varieties are the same as in any other member country; that is, that the vegetal variety is new, distinctive, homogeneous and stable.
Likewise the rights granted in Mexico in favour of plant breeders are basically the same; that is, the right to be recognized as the creator of the vegetal variety and the right to exploit said vegetal variety in an exclusive manner for the production, reproduction of sale thereof, as well as for the production of other vegetal varieties and hybrids for commercial purposes.
We have to point out that since Mexico is part of the UPOV treaty of 1978 – not yet having signed the UPOV act of 1991 – the term of protection for vegetal varieties is shorter than in other countries (15 and 18 years depending on the specific type of variety), but the rights are basically the same.
Nevertheless the way of enforcing those rights substantially differs from other UPOV member countries.

Unauthorized exploitation

In countries like Ecuador and Colombia vegetal variety rights are enforced by judicial authorities, and it is possible to take civil and even criminal actions against infringers, which strongly discourages many infringing activities in those countries. But in Mexico the authority in charge of enforcing vegetal variety rights is an administrative one. No civil criminal actions can be taken to enforce this type of right.
In Mexico the authority in charge of protecting plant variety rights is the National Service of Certification and Identification of Seeds (SNICS), which directly depends on the Ministry of Livestock and Agriculture (SAGARPA).
SNICS was created in 2003, the year in which the Federal Law of Vegetal Varieties (FLVV) came into force in Mexico. Since then SNICS has been in charge of studying the applications for protecting vegetal varieties, granting the corresponding plant breeders’ certificates and enforcing vegetal variety rights in Mexico, among other functions.
Another difference that has to be highlighted is that in Colombia it is possible to request the authorities to take action against third parties that are exploiting vegetal variety rights in an unauthorized manner. The corresponding certificate of plant breeder does not have to be granted at the moment of taking action, because it is only necessary that the authority issues a preliminary office action stating that an application for obtaining vegetal variety rights has been filed and studied by the authority.

Fines but not prison

In contrast, in Mexico the FLVV provides that once that applicant complies with the requirements of novelty, denomination and correct filling in of the application, SNICS will issue an office action indicating that an application for vegetal variety rights is under prosecution. Therefore the applicant is presumed to be the holder of the corresponding rights.
In Mexico it is possible taking action against third parties who exploit vegetal varieties in an unauthorized manner, only after the corresponding plant breeder certificate is issued by SNICS. The only effect of the above-mentioned office action is to grant applicant the right to claim damages since the date of the issuance of the office action. Nonetheless, in Mexico actions for collecting damages can be brought only after an infringement is declared by SNICS; this authority is not entitled to declare damages since that right is reserved in Mexico for civil Courts.
Consequently, it becomes necessary to wait until the plant breeder certificate is granted by SNICS in order to take infringement action, and it is necessary to wait until an infringement is confirmed in order to collect damages.
In this context, Article 48 of the FLVV considers the following activities as infringements:
  • To modify the denomination of a protected vegetal variety without the authorization of the Ministry.
  • To falsely present oneself as the creator of a vegetal variety.
  • To divulge or commercialize a vegetal variety as if it were of foreign origin when it is not the case, or to divulge or commercialize a vegetal variety as if it were of national original when it is not the case.
  • Opposing the visits of inspection that are conducted in accordance with the FLVV.
  • To commercially exploit the features or content of a protected vegetal variety, attributing said features or content to another vegetal variety.
  • To violate the preliminary injunctions provided in the FLVV.
As set forth above, all these infringements are punished only with fines and not with prison as in countries like Colombia and Ecuador.

Getting better

As part of the enforcement of this type of rights in Mexico, it is also possible to request SNICS to implement preliminary injunctions, which may consist of an order to retrieve from the market all the products and materials used to infringe vegetal variety rights; an order to suspend any activity that may constitute a violation to the FLVV; and the seizure of infringing goods.
It has to be said that the preliminary injunctions provided by the FLVV almost replicate those contained in the Mexican Law of Industrial Property and, therefore, many practices of the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property in connection with preliminary injunctions were copied by SNICS.
For instance, in order to obtain the implementation of preliminary injunctions it is necessary to post a bond to warrant any damages that may be caused to the person or company against whom injunctions are implemented; the alleged infringer has the right to post a counter bond in order to obtain the lifting of the injunctions.
When issuing the final ruling in connection with the infringement proceeding, SNICS will also decide regarding the permanence of the lifting of the injunctions.
At the time of writing, SNICS has not yet implemented injunctions against any third party. Nevertheless, despite the fact that SNICS was only recently set up, it is doing a great job protecting vegetal variety rights, considering that the legal remedies currently available under Mexican law are much more limited than those available in other countries of Latin America.
Obviously things can be improved in Mexico, starting with the signing of the UPOV Act of 1991, which would extend the term of protection and would allow a better protection of the essentially derived vegetal varieties, among other benefits.
Nevertheless, while these changes are taking place we have to recognize that, thanks to the good work that is being conducted by SNICS, efficient and proper enforcement of vegetal variety rights is being achieved in Mexico.